Featured case law commentary
-
VideosMember Talk – AI for litigators
In this Member Talk our expert speakers discuss why AI is becoming essential for litigators. They explore the AI tools currently available to litigators, the risks involved and how AI is transforming litigation., Whether you’re new to AI or looking to stay ahead, this session offers practical insights for the ...
-
VideosMember talks – back to basics: evidence
In this series of member talks, experts look at recent developments in handling evidence, particularly disclosure and witness statements in the Business and Property Courts. This series of bitesize videos, exclusive to Dispute Resolution Section members, is delivered by experts to support you in giving the best possible legal ...
-
VideosMember Talks - Back to basics: privilege
Exploring legal professional privilege, without prejudice privilege, and the evolving implications of AI on privilege. This series of bitesize videos, exclusive to Dispute Resolution Section members are delivered by experts to support you in giving the best possible legal advice to your clients.
-
FeatureDestin Trading Inc v Saipem SA
Ahmed Abdel Hakam looks at Destin Trading Inc v Saipem SA, and what it means for dispute resolution clauses
-
FeatureContract Natural Gas Ltd v Zog Energy Ltd
Ahmed Abdel Hakam examines Contract Natural Gas Ltd v Zog Energy Ltd, and what it shows for time running when a company goes into administration
-
VideosMember talk: mental health for litigators
In this 30-minute member talk, Leah Alpren-Waterman asks Richard Martin from the Mindful Business Charter, and Matthew Fitzwater from Barclays about their experience and views on mental health for litigators.
-
VideosMember talk - Litigator’s Survival Guide: Best tips from judges in conducting litigation
This session is focused on how documents can be managed and presented at trial.
-
FeatureChurchill v Merthyr Tydfil and the ADR duty
Masood Ahmed considers the implications of the Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil ruling
-
FeatureRea v Rea and undue influence claims
Rajinder Rai examines the judgment in Rea v Rea, and the implications for claims of undue influence
-
VideosMember talk: Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil Council
Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil Council has the potential to reshape the landscape of dispute resolution and access to justice.
-
FeatureShould litigation be a last resort? Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil Council
Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil Council has the potential to reshape the landscape of dispute resolution and access to justice. Rajinder Rai and Peter Causton untangle the weeds of the case
-
FeatureCase commentary: Belsner v Cam Legal Services Limited
Rupert Cohen summarises the landmark case of Belsner v CAM Legal Services, and what this means for solicitors going forward
-
FeatureBott & Co Limited v Ryanair
Anthony Field summarises how Rosenblatt secured a landmark Supreme Court win for Bott & Co Limited against Ryanair
-
FeatureTomlin orders, Gertner and consumer credit: are solicitors are risk?
Rupert Cohen looks at the case of CFL Finance Ltd v Laser Trust and Another, and what this means going forward
-
FeatureHow Adelekun v Ho affects cost orders
Tom Jenkinson examines the decision made in Adelekun v Ho, and the impact that has on costs orders
-
FeatureOn the Beach, out of jurisdiction
The rules on when claimants need to seek court permission to serve proceedings out of jurisdiction changed on 1 January 2021. Henk Soede, barrister at 1 Chancery Lane chambers, looks at a recent case where permission was granted.
-
FeatureDisclosing “adverse” and “known adverse” documents
Genevieve Cripps looks at Castle Water Limited v Thames Utilities Limited, a case which clarified the meaning of adverse documents pursuant to Practice Direction 51U (PD51U).
-
AnalysisNokes v Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust [2015] EWHC B6 (Costs)
In one of the first judgments since the Jackson reforms, Master Leonard has given useful guidance on the extent of recoverability of post-LASPO ATE premiums in medical negligence claims
-
AnalysisP v P [2015] EWCA Civ 447
Court of Appeal upholds Mr Justice Mostyn’s decision to vary a trust in a nuptial settlement, in order to meet the wife’s financial claim. In his judgment, Lord Justice Jackson gave guidance about the procedure to appeal a High Court decision
-
Analysis
Cashman v Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 1312 (QB)
The High Court overrules a senior costs judge, after he denied a claimant who made a successful part 36 offer in detailed assessment proceedings the additional 10% uplift