Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil Council has the potential to reshape the landscape of dispute resolution and access to justice.
In a 25-minute video, our speakers explore how this judgment brings about significant implications for dispute resolution in England and Wales and how it sets the scene for how parties should treat alternative dispute resolution (ADR) going forward.
Did you find this video helpful? Share your feedback in a one-minute survey
Speakers include:
- Richard Miller, head of justice at the Law Society
- Professor Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester and a member of our Section advisory committee
- Julian Caddick, head of costs at Thompsons Solicitors and a member of our Section advisory committee
I want to know more
Other relevant resources that may be useful include:
- Why we intervened in Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil
- Court of Appeal hands down judgment in Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil
To improve long-term access to justice, we’re exploring ideas for practical, affordable changes to our civil justice system, including options for non-court dispute resolution.
Explore our ideas, join the conversation on justice fit for the 21st century
