Welcome to the Dispute Resolution Section - a member community designed to help civil litigators and mediators excel in what they do.

Save time with everything you need to stay on top of your game all available in one place with webinars, events, trusted resources, discounts and more.
  • The future of mediation: voluntary or compulsory

  • Wellbeing for litigators

  • Member talk: mental health for litigators

  • New parliament, new justice?

  • Without prejudice?

  • The impact of Hague Judgments Convention 2019

  • The challenge and potential future of court chronologies

  • Are electronic signatures valid?

  • Assessing the Arbitration Bill

  • Member talk - Litigator’s Survival Guide: Best tips from judges in conducting litigation

All features and opinion

Law Society library

library-600x400

Gain a competitive edge and give the best possible legal advice with the trusted resources and support available through the Law Society library.

As a section member you are entitled to the following library benefits***:

* Subject to standard page limits, terms and conditions and for current judicial proceedings or non-commercial purposes.

** Including additional research on top of the standard 30 minutes, the Lawdocs Service (first item free), and printing and photocopying services.

*** All benefits are valid between 1 November 2023 - 31 December 2024. Applies to all Law Society Section members, and members must state from initial contact that they are a current Section member when requesting any of these services.

  • Member talk: mental health for litigators

  • Member talk - Litigator’s Survival Guide: Best tips from judges in conducting litigation

  • Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil and the ADR duty

  • Rea v Rea and undue influence claims

  • Member talk: Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil Council

  • Should litigation be a last resort? Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil Council

  • Case commentary: Belsner v Cam Legal Services Limited

  • Bott & Co Limited v Ryanair

  • Tomlin orders, Gertner and consumer credit: are solicitors are risk?

  • How Adelekun v Ho affects cost orders

All case commentary