Is an expert needed? London Aviation Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland
The recently reported case of London Aviation Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2017] EWHC 1037 (Ch) decided that an expert was not ‘reasonably required’ because, on the facts of the case, an expert was unlikely to assist the judge.
This is premium content
In order to access this content you must be a member of the Civil Litigation Section and logged in.
If you have not registered before, register now to gain access to this content. You must use the email associated with your section membership.
Log inNot a Civil Litigation Section Member?
Join nowif you require assistance with joining this section, please email us at caadmin@lawsociety.org.uk or call us on 020 733 804