All Property articles – Page 42
-
FeatureGreen and pleasant land?
The high-profile case of the undercroft on London’s South Bank has highlighted the continuing issues around town and village greens. Antonia Murillo explains the law and practice, and how solicitors should advise landowners wanting to develop unused land
-
FeatureOpen house
New legislation offers homebuyers and tenants greater protection from misleading statements about properties, but it will also affect property agents and solicitors. Robert Bolwell explains
-
FeatureSafe as houses
Conveyancing has traditionally been considered a high-risk area for complaints and insurance claims from both clients and lenders. Steve Ray explains how conveyancing firms can allay these concerns for the insurers and get the best out of this year’s renewal process
-
FeatureSnakes and ladders
With the property market looking up, many conveyancing firms are back in the recruitment market. But how can you ensure that you recruit the appropriate staff resource to cope with future market changes? Victor Olowe explains
-
FeatureThe weakest link
Marlon Appleton provides a step-by-step guide to one of the trickiest elements of stamp duty land tax: how the legislation applies to transactions linked by connected persons, in a series, or within a single scheme
-
-
Analysis
R (on the application of Andrews) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
In a test case with the potential to affect 500 to 1,000 other public rights of way, the claimant challenged the defendant Secretary of State’s decision, upholding a local authority’s refusal to modify the definitive map of the area to include a public bridleway.
-
Analysis
Balevents Ltd v Sartori
The claimants brought proceedings against the defendant, contending that he held registered title in respect of part of a pavement in front of a club on a constructive trust for one of them and that the register should be rectified accordingly.
-
AnalysisCoventry v Lawrence and changes to the law of nuisance
Peter Reekie considers the implications of a recent case in relation to how remedies should be applied following the breach of an easements
-
AnalysisSpotlight: Marks & Spencer v BNP Paribas
The Court of Appeal has overruled an earlier High Court decision that would have allowed Marks & Spencer to claim back over £1 million in rent and other charges.
-
Analysis
Shebelle Enterprises Ltd v Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust Ltd
The claimant tenant issued proceedings to restrain the defendant trust from consenting to substantial development, allegedly interfering with its right to quiet enjoyment under its lease. The judge dismissed the application and the claimant appealed.
-
Analysis
Barclays Wealth Trustees (Jersey) Ltd v Erimus Housing Ltd
The Court of Appeal overturned a High Court decision that a tenant, which remained in occupation of commercial premises after its lease had expired, did so on the basis of an implied annual periodic tenancy, and held it was instead a tenancy at will.
-
AnalysisSpotlight: E.Surv v Goldsmith Williams Solicitors
The High Court rules on the terms of the ‘Bowerman duty’ around enquiries in a residential conveyancing transaction
-
AnalysisThe Siemens case and the wording of break clauses
Peter Reekie looks at the Siemens Hearing Instruments Ltd v Friends Life case, which related to the position in respect of wording in a break clause, that had no apparent purpose
-
Analysis
Coventry v Lawrence
The claimants brought a nuisance action against the defendant in respect of the noise generated by motor sports conducted on their land.
-
Analysis
Xenakis v Birkett Long LLP
Issues arising upon the uptake of occupation prior to the formal completion of a lease.
-
AnalysisCourt of Appeal holds law firm accountable for lender's loss
Peter Reekie outlines the findings in the recent case around potential breach of negligence where a law firm is caught out by a fraudster
-
Analysis
Santander UK plc v R.A. Legal Solicitors
The Court of Appeal ruled that a law firm’s departure from best practice played a material part in the loss suffered by a lender, and therefore it would not be fair to grant the law firm any relief from liability for breach of trust under section 61 of the Trustee ...