Cris McCurley and Zimran Samuel provide an overview of the new FGM provisions of the Serious Crime Act 2015.
The Serious Crime Act 2015 (the 2015 act), which received Royal Assent on 3 March 2015, introduces several provisions to tackle the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM), both when it occurs in this jurisdiction, and also when the practice is carried out elsewhere in the world on children habitually resident in this jurisdiction.
The 2015 act makes provision for:
This article will address the introduction of FGM protection orders (FGMPOs).
Section 73 of the 2015 act inserts a new Section 5A and Schedule 2 into the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 (the 2003 act), making provision for FGM Protection Orders. The FGM Protection Order is now available in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and offers the means of protection to girls and women who are victims, or may be at risk of FGM.
The criminal law on FGM has been in place since 1985 but there hasn’t been a single successful prosecution. There are many cases in which victims are reluctant to come forward because of the impression that the only possible result may be that the full force of the criminal law is brought against their close family members. However, the framework of civil orders offers much more flexibility in terms of how a court proceeds with such a case.
Whereas the criminal law in intended to punish perpetrators, the civil orders allow for intervention to prevent FGM
Importantly, whereas the criminal law is intended to punish perpetrators after FGM has happened, the new civil orders allow for intervention to prevent potential victims from being subjected to FGM in the first place. Further, FGMPOs can come with a whole host of restrictions against potential perpetrators and it is hoped that the new orders will also act as a strong deterrence against the practice of FGM.
The procedure surrounding FGMPOs is modeled on forced marriage protection orders (FMPO), which were introduced by the Forced Marriage Civil Protection Act 2007.
Current figures for FMPO applications indicate that of the 173 applications made in 2013, 72 were made by the person to be protected (or their legal representative); 51 by the relevant third party; 50 by other third parties (i.e. a family member, friend or someone in the community. The figures for this period also show that the majority of applications for FMPOs were made to protect minors (persons age 17 or under). Of the 173 applications made, 112 were to protect persons age 17 or under; 57 to protect persons over 17 and in 4 cases, the age of the person to be protected was unknown.
The procedural court rules for FGM Protection Orders are contained in Part 11 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010.
An application for a FGM Protection Order can be made on form FGM001 available for the Ministry of Justice website. Applications can be made by the person seeking protection or by a ‘connected’ person on her behalf. Applications can also be made by ‘relevant third parties’.
In due course the Lord Chancellor will be passing regulations to approve a list of those bodies that are designated as ‘relevant third parties’. The regulation currently released by the Lord Chancellor only makes provision for local authorities to apply as relevant third parties. This is due to the fact that the commencement of the FGM Protection Order provisions was brought forward to coincide with school summer holidays when the risk of girls being taken abroad for FGM is particularly high.
It is essential that the court is provided with as much information as possible to assist the making of the correct decision
FGM can occur at different ages and in different forms from tribe to tribe and from country to country. The consequences of the wrong decision being made by the court can have life-long implications for the health and wellbeing of the potential victim, so it is essential that the court is provided with as much information as possible to assist the making of the correct decision.
In cases where the allegations of risk of harm are denied, children may be made parties to the proceedings. Many instances involve parents denying any intent to inflict or arrange FGM.
Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the 2003 act sets out:
23 family courts have been designated to deal with applications for FGM Protection Orders. These courts have been selected in order to build up expertise in this area and given the specialist nature of these cases.
Currently the following courts have been designated: Central Family Court, Birmingham Civil and Family Justice Centre, Bradford Combined Court, Brighton Family Court Hearing Centre, Bristol Civil and Family Justice Centre, Cardiff Civil and Family Justice Centre, Derby Combined Court, East London Family Court, Leeds Combined Court, Leicester County Court and Family Centre, Liverpool Civil and Family Court Hearing Centre, Luton County Court and Family Court, Manchester County Court and Family Court Newcastle upon Tyne Combined Court Centre, Norwich Combined Court and Family Hearing Centre, Oxford Combined Court and Family Court Hearing Centre, Plymouth Combined Court, Portsmouth Combined Court Centre, Preston Family Court, Reading County Court and Family Court Hearing Centre, Sheffield Combined Court Centre, Teesside Combined Court, West London Family Court.
Applications may also be heard at the High Court and if it is an international case (for example where this is evidence that a girl has been taken abroad for FGM to be carried out) then the High Court is most likely to be the correct forum.
These cases usually involve complex cultural issues, often with an international dimension. It may often be necessary for the court to require the assistance of a anthropologist or cultural expert. Often cases may be contested, so the court will need as much information to be placed before it as possible in order to make a finding of risk.
Finally it is worth adding that in recognition of the complex nature of the matters to be proved, Resolution is to provide training and accreditation in respect of FGM applications.