- Law Society Communities
- Civil Litigation
- Ethnic Minority Lawyers
- Human Rights
We commission exclusive articles from leading practitioners and commentators, on all areas of family law and practice
In the second installment on emotional health for lawyers, Julian Hall takes a look at the behaviours that undermine our sense of wellbeing
In the first of our debates, Rebecca Harling and Karen Dovaston share their views on the MOJ’s proposals for enhanced fees for divorce proceedings
In this complex, high-value case, a husband was able to successfully demonstrate the assets attributed to him were not available for distribution. Sofia Moussaoui was instructed by the respondent
Appleton v Gallagher confirms that parties in the family court are entitled to privacy in relation to their financial affairs. Rebecca Harling provides an overview of current reporting restrictions in financial remedies proceedings
Cris McCurley and Zimran Samuel provide an overview of the new FGM provisions of the Serious Crime Act 2015.
As a Section member, you're entitled to four webinars as part of your membership, available live and on-demand
In one of the four webinars inclusive in 2015 Family Section membership, David Salter and Philip Way provide guidance on the methods of accessing pension funds, the implications on pension sharing and the red flags to watch out for
In one of the four webinars inclusive in 2015 Family Section membership, Daniel Bromilow examines this complex area of law, including recent case law, and what advice to give to couples moving in together or separating
The Law Society’s Practice Advice Service outlines the support the Law Society provides for disputes over professional fees and considers whether there is a duty to inform the client
The Law Society’s Library lists precedents for the engagement of a childminder
The links below will take you to www.lawgazette.co.uk
Practitioners urged to double-check papers after 'basic errors’ are uncovered by the new Bury St Edmunds centre for London and south-east.
Outcome of case where judge considered deductions of success fees and insurance premiums from children’s compensation is worrying.