The cut-off date for payment protection insurance claims is 29 August 2019. Lesley King looks at what this means for private client practitioners
Roman Kubiak comments on Lomax v Lomax  EWHC 1267 (Fam), an Inheritance Act claim where the court refused to force parties to early neutral evaluation.
Roman Kubiak looks at Kohli v Proles  EWHC 193 (Ch), where the court dismissed an application to appeal the finding of an England and Wales domicile in Inheritance Act claim.
In something of a mixed bag this month, Lesley King comments on the introduction of civil partnerships for opposite-sex couples and the latest news on probate fees.
Roman Kubiak comments on an assisted suicide case where a widow was granted relief against the forfeiture rule, and a case in which another widow was refused relief to bring a claim for financial provision out of time.
Lesley King comments on Cowan v Foreman and ors  EWHC 349 Fam, and looks at what the case means for both contentious and non-contentious probate practitioners.
Lesley King comments on recent developments in the private client sector, such as the controversial increase in probate fees and new wording for grant applications.
Roman Kubiak considers two contentious probate cases: an attorney’s application to be appointed as substitute personal representative in place of a donor; and a property transfer set aside for presumed undue influence.
Roman Kubiak breaks down the complex case of Bhusate v Patel & Ors  EWHC 2362 (Ch), in which the claimant suffered a heavy defeat after pleading contradictory alternative claims.
Lesley King comments on recent developments including the new transparency rules and guidance on lasting powers of attorney.